
A snapshot of Asian energy
English.news.cn 2010-08-16 20:10:05
by Zhang Xiaojun, Liu Ying and Liu Zan
BEIJING, Aug. 16 (Xinhua) -- Developing a green economy based on sustainable development is necessary for our world that is short of energy.
While many have suspected that the financial crisis will discourage the costly green projects, more countries are committed to continued investment in the sector.
Oil-rich Gulf countries and fast-growing Asian economies are likely to continue to invest on renewable energy.
Western powers also pledged to increase their green spending despite the looming budget squeeze.
U.S. President Barack Obama, who has long said renewable energy sources will play a vital role in the nation's future, has asked the Congress for 9 billion U.S. dollars in loan guarantees for renewable energy projects.
Analysts say global spending on the green economy has bounced back and is likely to exceed 2008 levels and reach 200 billion dollars in 2010.
What motives these governments to invest boldly in green economy is obvious -- whoever builds the first efficient and effective economy will lead the global economy in this century.
U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said striving for the green economy is "an ambitious goal, but it is achievable and is necessary."
The question is, how can we reach this goal?
The governments should focus on at least two areas: developing renewable energy and improving energy efficiency.
Renewable energy, which comes from natural resources such as sunlight, wind and tides, has its pros and cons.
On the one hand, it has great potential. For instance, solar power can provide as much as 1000 times the total world energy consumption in 2008, but only 0.02 percent of the total energy consumption that year came from the Sun.
But the return from investment on renewable energy would not be seen in short term. For example, although the commercialization of solar cells started almost 50 years ago, solar power still cannot compete in the market with fossil fuels that generate electricity more cheaply.
For quick benefits, improving energy efficiency is a good choice. The governments may urge enterprises and individuals to improve building insulation or replace obsolete heating and cooling equipments.
Besides, long-term projects can also be carried out in an effort to develop green economy.
Fossil fuels, which produce considerable greenhouse gases, remain the stable sources of electricity in the foreseeable future. The International Energy Agency predicts that the demand for coal will increase 53 percent between 2007 and 2030.
Some governments began to support the development of carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) demonstration projects to reduce the effects of fossil fuel emissions on global warming. The idea is to make coal burn cleanly by injecting millions of tons of carbon dioxide into the ground.
From a historical perspective, Germany has set a good example in developing green economy. It has not only lowered its dependence on fossil fuels, but also created a new economic engine, which is cleaner and provides more jobs.
Since the oil crisis in the 1970s, Germany has begun to cut energy consumption and look for alternative resources. In 1986, Germany set up a federal ministry to regulate issues on environment and energy policy. In 1991, Germany introduced feed-in tariff to further support the development and use of renewable energy technologies.
Consequently, by 2008, renewable energy sources have accounted for 15.1 percent of total German power consumption and helped cut greenhouse gas emission by 112 million tons. It employed over 280,000 people and had a turnover of 30 billion euros (38.2 billion dollars).
This report stems from a historic shift in business leaders' perceptions of energy and climate change
issues. In the last decade, rising and volatile energy prices have converged with increasing concern about climate change and growing consumer support for action on energy and environmental issues to drive a surge of corporate environmental commitments. As companies have begun to act on these commitments, energy efficiency has emerged as a first-priority strategy. Accordingly, many companies have launched aggressive efficiency strategies, in many cases well beyond the scope and reach of earlier efforts.
This report documents these leading-edge energy efficiency strategies, distilling the best practices and providing guidance and resources for other businesses choosing this path. It was developed over nearly two years of effort from Pew Center on Global Climate Change staff, a project advisory committee, members of the Pew Center's Business Environmental Leadership Council (BELC),1 project consultants, and report authors.
The project encompassed a detailed survey of BELC members and other leading companies, in-depth case studies of six companies, a series of workshops on key energy efficiency topics, broader research in the corporate energy field, and development of a full-featured web portal to provide a platform for highlighting and updating key findings from the project as well as providing tools, resources, and other important information. The report covers efficiency strategies encompassing internal operations, supply chains, products and services, and cross-cutting issues.
A key finding from this report is that climate change has reframed corporate energy strategies. Companies that take on carbon footp inting and reduction strategies quickly come to see their energy use in a whole new light. On average, companies surveyed for this study reported spending less than five percent of total revenues on energy-even in today's relatively high cost energy environment.
But when these companies calculate their carbon footprint, they typically find that their energy consumption accounts for the great majority of their directly measurable emissions impact. Suddenly, energy shifts from a small cost item to the biggest piece of their carbon footprint. Viewed from this perspective, energy efficiency becomes a sustainability2 imperative.
The report was released at the energy efficiency conference in Chicago, which addressed key report findings, including The Seven Habits of Highly Efficient Companies.
These seven habits distill the elements of an exemplary corporate energy efficiency strategy into a set of core practices and principles. These are:
To read the full report and six in-depth case studies, visit here.
by Richard Wilhelm
Sal Rand with participants in the training course on gasoline in Hanoi, Vietnam.
Sal Rand knows quite a bit about petroleum. Fortunately, he has been more than happy to share his knowledge with the rest of the world.
An ASTM International member for more than 30 years, Rand has been instrumental in Committee D02 on Petroleum Products and Lubricants since his earliest days on the committee.
During his career with Texaco, Rand managed the Fuels Testing Laboratory, which tested all liquid fuels and some gaseous fuels. His work led to the development of a quality assurance program that included the use of mobile testing vans to perform tests in remote areas. The program became the standard in the industry.
While acting as chair of Subcommittee D02.05 on Properties of Fuels, Petroleum Coke and Carbon Material, Rand became involved with a then-new to D02 task group on pitch and helped develop a number of important standards on petroleum coke, manufactured carbon material and pitch.
Rand also recalls his participation in the development of the key standard D6045, Test Method for Color of Petroleum Products by the Automatic Tristimulus Method. D6045 is used by the paint, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries, among others, in determining color automatically.
While Rand thought that his ASTM work might be curtailed after his retirement from Texaco in 1994, it was actually the beginning of a new adventure. Approached to teach an ASTM Technical and Professional Training course on gasoline, Rand took some time to design such a course and wrote a manual for it. He first taught it soon after his retirement and has now presented "Gasoline: Specifications, Testing and Technology" in more countries than he can readily remember, though he can say that he has taught it everywhere from Taiwan to Ecuador to Bahrain to Singapore.
"I've taught the course close to 100 times and it keeps changing," says Rand. "There are new things happening out there and I've got to stay abreast of it. ASTM is a good resource for doing that."
According to Rand, the gasoline course covers a broad and comprehensive look at many subjects relating to the fuel. Topics include an overview of ASTM and its standards developing process, refining, chemistry and volatility, which Rand notes is a crucial component.
In addition, Rand talks about fuel additives and oxygenates, and touches on the U.S. Clean Air Act — what is mandated by it, what testing is needed and what the Act restricts.
While course participants from the petroleum industry range from those in marketing to researchers, Rand says that many of his students do not work directly in the petroleum industry. These include attorneys, regulators and chemists from a variety of testing laboratories. Rand gives participants his e-mail address and says that he'll often receive follow-up questions from them even a few years after they've taken the course.
In addition to the gasoline course, Rand has developed aan ASTM "Fuels Technology Course" that combines gasoline, diesel and aviation fuels that he has also presented throughout the world.
Rand says he has gained much from his ASTM experience, with his favorite part being interaction with other people. "You get to know the top people in the world who are working on test methods and specifications and the meetings are beautifully informal," Rand says. "Anybody will talk to anybody. ASTM is here for a reason and I think it is doing a magnificent job." Rand's wife of 53 years, Agnes, has accompanied him on many of his trips to both ASTM meetings and training sessions around the world. When he's not on the road, Rand enjoys spending time with his five children and nine grandchildren, and doing volunteer work near his home in Florida.